Using this assumption, if the payout increases disproportionately relative to the size of the bet, the probability would have to decrease. In statistics terminology, it would make sense to maintain the same expected return (payout multiplied by probability), in order to obtain the same overall percent payback for different players (although I doubt they are required to maintain such consistency). I keep telling her that I believe the odds of hitting those combinations would significantly decrease if she paid the maximum, but she doesn’t believe me.
Do they also decrease the odds of hitting the jackpot combination when the maximum bet is played?Īdditional information: My wife cannot afford to play the maximum bet, but when she hits the jackpot combinations, she thinks she missed out. Question: Many slot machines offer a disproportionately higher return on the jackpot combination when the maximum size bet is played.
